Re: Moving libglade into guile-gtk ?

[Ariel Rios]

On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 16:42, Bill Gribble wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 13:51, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Yeah, gnome/gtk may be rather heavy for it... I'm quite pleased with what
> > I've seen of guile-gtk, but if there was a glade editor which didn't require
> > the gnome outhouse, it would be better yet.
> 
glade editor? What do you mean by that?

> I'm not sure what you mean by this. Debian has 'glade' and 'glade-gnome'
> packages which are with and without Gnome support.  Is that what you
> mean?  Or were you talking about the guile (gtk libglade) module being
> part of guile-gnome rather than guile-gtk? 
If you were refering to this, I am waiting for Bill's patch
that will enable to use libglade using the full GNOME power,
or the lightweight gtk.

ariel