Re: The 1.6.1 release.

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

    Rob> Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
    >> good question.
    >> 
    >> IMO, the more branches there are the more PITA it is to maintain them.
    >> this suggests that to cut ourselves slack we should delay branching
    >> until things are *determined* to be stable (as opposed being *declared*
    >> to be stable).

    Rob> I have no problem with this.  This is what I'd intended for the next
    Rob> release.

Although I'm probably a prime culprit (because of the elisp work in
unstable), I also agree with this.  It's a major pain having to work
with multiple branches over an extended period.

(Especially when that period includes deciding to merge all the
documentation directories and then separate them out again - d'oh!)

        Neil