Re: Threads and asyncs

[Tom Lord]

       > If Guile never budges on the stack issue, I would still be
       > inclined to see it as an implementation optimized for cases
       > when the C stack is used heavily.

And, not to reopen old wounds or restart old fights --- 

RnRS is plainly wrong on (eq? #f '()) ....  that's the biggest
obstacle.

Indeed, after resuming hacking emacs lisp in recent history, I'm
starting to think that the old CL bit of:

        (car nil) => nil
        (cdr nil) => nil

is also not a bad idea.   "Protective errors" are often wrong.

-t