Re: sorting by a partial order

[rm]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:12:45PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Keith Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I don't know what you have been reading, but Paul's use of "poset"
> 
> Too bad I didn't actually use that word. :)  Sorry for the confusion.
> Maybe it would have been clearer if I explained that my relation means
> "B depends on A", so in the result A must precede B.  This is for a
> program similar to make.

Hmm, wouldn't that be a nice place to use Schelog (Prolog in Scheme)?
If i remember correctly, i had it running under Guile without problems--
i could try and dig it up from my harddisk if you want me to.

 Ralf Mattes