[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: defined?

From: Matt Hellige
Subject: Re: defined?
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:01:58 -0600
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

[Egil Moeller <address@hidden>]
> The problem is
> guile> (let ((b 5)) (eval 'b  (interaction-environment)))
> <unnamed port>: In expression b:
> <unnamed port>: Unbound variable: b
> ABORT: (unbound-variable)

Yes, good point. I suppose the problem is that you want a closure
representing the actual current environment rather than the top-level.
It seems like there should be a way to do this...?


Matt Hellige                  address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]