Re: lazy evaluation: Goops class/instance customization

[David Allouche]

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:51:19PM +0200, Maarten Grachten wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2003, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> 
> > Then, in order to get correct semantics, you should remove
> > `primitive-eval' and instead use the following (untested) version of
> > make-lazy:
>
[...]
> 
> Ah. Indeed, that seems to work as well. But I don't really see where the 
> crucial difference is. 
> (not questioning the superiority of this solution :-)

Probably, some scheme guru will give a more useful answer. But I
cannot resist this:

  Eval is Evil. Closures close the case.

-- 
                                                            -- ddaa