[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: continuation?
From: |
Bill Schottstaedt |
Subject: |
Re: continuation? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 May 2003 05:08:11 -0700 |
> A continuation is just a procedure. It is not guaranteed to be
> distinguishable from an "ordinary" procedure.
It is not "just a procedure" -- it has all kinds
of extra semantics -- can give me some reference
to a discussion about this? I'd say the compiler's problems
are irrelevant at this level -- how is an error handler supposed
to tell that it has received a "real" continuation (which would
continue...) as opposed to "just a procedure" (which would not)?