[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:47:09 -0500 |
From: Tom Lord <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Do you _really_ want to know? It's a _large_ topic but one that does
admit very precise analysis.
for me, to know is not as important as how i come to know (that is, the
learning process). one of these days i'll finish writing the program
that will automatically produce the "illustrated guide to regular
expression engine internals" (as a specialization of the more general
illustrated guide to digital logic specification and evaluation).
text pattern languages that require backtracking (but don't obviously
lack linear alternatives of comperable expressiveness (but are dirt
simple to implement)) and what do we do about regular expression
engines that think they are only about contiguous text?
if i understand you correctly, this illustrated guide will have to admit
several fundamental regexp engines; there is no unifying architecture
possible. (shrug.) that's fine, too. so it goes.
thi
[cc trimmed]
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/10/24
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/26
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Dale P. Smith, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, rm, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Marlow, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/10/27
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Harri Haataja, 2003/10/29