[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:37:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i [Guile enabled] |
Hi,
Today, 24 minutes, 28 seconds ago, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> i'd like to keep them out of SCM_ namespace, actually, and tried for the
> "M" namespace, which is admittedly easy to stumble on inadvertantly by
> other code. guile 1.4.x has SCM_ and GH_ already, maybe GHM_ (for guile
> high-level "module support") is better. how does that sound?
I actually don't see the point in having different namespaces for Guile
things. :)
> since it's an additive change, introducing these macros does not raise
> compatibility issues, but of course there may be other criterion by
> which they will be rejected. there's a lot of stuff in 1.4.x[1] that
> could easily be added to other guile branches but the will to do so has
> not yet materialized (and might never). that's not something i can
> control so i don't worry about it, generally.
The doc snarfing example you gave is a nice thing. Unfortunately, there
is no such thing in Guile 1.6. Is there any reason for continuing
development for 1.4.x rather than working on 1.6.x?
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/11/13
- Re: cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/14
- Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Roland Orre, 2003/11/14
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Ludovic Courtès, 2003/11/14
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Roland Orre, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Ludovic Courtès, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17