[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:04:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i [Guile enabled] |
Hi,
One day, 17 hours, 34 seconds ago,
Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Ok, I have installed the following hash function into 1.7. As a nice
> side effect, guile seems to start a bit faster now. (Although the new
> function does more work than the old. Talk about being too clever.)
BTW, is this function also used for hashing symbol names? If so, then
it must slightly improve performance!
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, (continued)
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Ludovic Courtès, 2003/11/14
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Roland Orre, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Ludovic Courtès, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Allister MacLeod, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17
- OT: x86 assembly timings/size (was Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?), Allister MacLeod, 2003/11/17
- Re: OT: x86 assembly timings/size, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/17
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Does anyone have a better scm_string_hash ?, Marius Vollmer, 2003/11/19
Re: cmod-play 1 available + modsup.h additions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/11/14