[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: null terminated strings
|
From: |
Paul Jarc |
|
Subject: |
Re: null terminated strings |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:02:01 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: address@hidden (Paul Jarc)
>
> > FWIW, I think that (preferably copy-on-write) shared substrings are
> > valuable enough for performance
>
> mutation-effects-both shared substrings are valuable as a feature of
> (extended) Scheme.
I agree... now. :)
> mutation-effects-both shared substrings are an improvement to Scheme.
Unless you're a fan of pure functional languages, of course.
paul
- Re: argz SMOB, (continued)
- Re: argz SMOB, Brian S McQueen, 2004/01/15
- Re: argz SMOB, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/15
- null terminated strings (was: argz SMOB), Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Message not available
- Re: null terminated strings, Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Roland Orre, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Brian S McQueen, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Tom Lord, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings,
Paul Jarc <=
- Re: null terminated strings, Roland Orre, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Ken Anderson, 2004/01/19
- Re: null terminated strings, Per Bothner, 2004/01/19
- Re: null terminated strings, Ken Anderson, 2004/01/19