[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Worrying development
From: |
rm |
Subject: |
Re: Worrying development |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:09:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:28:03PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Also, there is the possibility on the horizon that we turn string-ref
> > etc into 'primitive generics' which means that people could implement
> > new kinds of strings using GOOPS.
>
> Neat. Has/might that also be done for car & cdr? Then we could have
> Python-like generators. It would make SCM_C[AD]R less speedy, though
> they could still be pretty fast for actual pairs.
Wow, _that_ would be a real help! I have to build bindings for some
heavy C++ libs that make excessive use of iterators. A generic 'sequence'
type with the right generics would help a lot -- the bindings would look
much more scheme-ish.
Ralf Mattes
>
> paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
- Re: Worrying development, (continued)
- Re: Worrying development, Tom Lord, 2004/01/22
- Re: Worrying development, Dirk Herrmann, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Tom Lord, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Dirk Herrmann, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Tom Lord, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Tom Lord, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Tom Lord, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/23
- Re: Worrying development,
rm <=
- Re: Worrying development, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/24
- overriding car/cdr (was: Worrying development), Paul Jarc, 2004/01/25
- Re: Shared Substrings [was: Worrying development], Robert Uhl, 2004/01/22