[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary
From: |
Mike Gran |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary |
Date: |
Mon, 3 May 2004 10:43:38 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Linas Vepstas <address@hidden> wrote:
> So what's the difference between that and LGPL?
> If so, then why isn't guile under LGPL?
My guess is this. The LGPL requires that the work be a library. Guile
is part library and part stand-alone.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
- Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Mike Gran, 2004/05/02
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Thamer Al-Harbash, 2004/05/02
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Mike Gran, 2004/05/02
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Linas Vepstas, 2004/05/03
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary,
Mike Gran <=
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Rob Browning, 2004/05/14
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/15
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Rob Browning, 2004/05/15
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/17
- Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/24
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Linas Vepstas, 2004/05/03
Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary, Paul Emsley, 2004/05/04