[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (slightly OT) Dynamic link w/o *.h [was: Guile questions]

From: Linas Vepstas
Subject: Re: (slightly OT) Dynamic link w/o *.h [was: Guile questions]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:57:59 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:55:34AM -0500, Linas Vepstas was heard to remark:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:01:18PM +0200, address@hidden was heard to remark:
> > pondering for a while about `glueless bindings' myself (along the
> > lines: if gdb can do that... -- but gdb uses the source plus
> > debugging info: I'd be happy to get that, and you seem to be even
> I thought (and might be wrong) that the function signatures are in 
> the debug (-g) info in the .o (the gnu elf 'stabs'), and that the 
> source wasn't needed.  Not so?  I wonder if 'objdump' already knows 
> this: this would imply that the ability to get the signatures is 
> already in a gas library, vastly simplifying your task.

and, of course, this is totally the wrong mailing list for this
discussion, you want to do that on the gcc mailing lists, and/or the
glibc mailing lists.


pub  1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <address@hidden>
PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984  3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]