[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Uniform vectors, user survey
From: |
Steve Tell |
Subject: |
Re: Uniform vectors, user survey |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:50:29 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to unify our two implementations of uniform vectors, and make
> them more useful.
In general, sounds like a good idea.
> I have close to zero experience with using uniform vectors myself, so
> I appreciate your input. Do you use uniform vectors? What for? Did
> you try but couldn't make them work for you? What do you wish would
> be different about them? Etc.
In a quick survey of my code, I've always used uniform vectors to
store scheme objects (booleans or lists) an never for the 10 numeric types
allowed by srfi-4 vectors.
I remember chosing uniform vectors over the related vector and array
types when I knew that the length wouldn't change and the types were all,
well, uniform. The vector and uniform-vector procedures seemed a bit
simpler than the array ones, but (non-uniform) vectors or arrays would
probably have worked.
I've never used uniform vectors as part of an interface to C code. I don't
think the documentation covered the srfi4 back when I first wrote many of
the things I surveyed.
Steve
- Uniform vectors, user survey, Marius Vollmer, 2004/10/22
- Re: Uniform vectors, user survey, Neil Jerram, 2004/10/23
- Re: Uniform vectors, user survey, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2004/10/24
- Re: Uniform vectors, user survey, Stephen Compall, 2004/10/25
- Re: Uniform vectors, user survey, Mike Gran, 2004/10/25
- Re: Uniform vectors, user survey,
Steve Tell <=