Re: Refactoring dynamic roots

[Neil Jerram]

Marius Vollmer wrote:
> In my working copy, current input port etc are now fluids.  There is
> no dynamic state that isn't a fluid.

Which reminds me of the one thought I had, namely globally replacing 
"dynamic-state" in your proposal by "fluid-state".  To my mind, this 
would have the advantage that it would be obvious that fluids were 
connected with the fluid-state.

(Alternatively, could change "make-fluid" etc. to "make-dynamic"; but 
I'm assuming that the term "fluid" is more established in the standards 
and literature - is this correct?)

(In general, by the way, I'm very happy with this and your other recent 
proposals.)

Regards,
        Neil