Re: SRFI-4's `scm_take_TAGvector ()'

[Marius Vollmer]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hi,
>
> While the name of the `scm_take_TAGvector ()' function is pretty good at
> suggesting that it will take control over the data pointed to by the
> first argument, I find the prototype of these functions quite
> misleading.  IMO, instead of:
>
>   SCM scm_take_u8vector (const scm_t_uint8 *data, size_t len);
>
> this should be:
>
>   SCM scm_take_u8vector (scm_t_uint8 *data, size_t len);
>
> What do you think?

I agree.  I made that change.

(Slowly working towards your other patches now... hang in there...)

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405