[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another load path idea
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Another load path idea |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:39:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> A question though. What is the problem which is being solved here?
>
> That's escaped me too.
>
> (I have a feeling the present "site" dir is modelled on emacs, I
> haven't been able to follow why it's not enough ...)
Roughly, the point is that some packages may want to install elsewhere,
not in `site'. Therefore, the _default_ value of `%load-path' needs to
be configurable. Typically, a package that installs to `/opt/foo' may
want to tell Guile to add this directory to its default `%load-path'.
Then, for a summary of the important stages of this everlasting
discussion, you may want to look at:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2006-01/msg00064.html .
;-)
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Another load path idea, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/07
- Re: Another load path idea, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/12
- Re: Another load path idea, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/12
- Re: Another load path idea, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/19
- Re: Another load path idea, Kevin Ryde, 2006/01/20
- Re: Another load path idea, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/21
- Re: Another load path idea, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/23
- Re: Another load path idea, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/23
- Re: Another load path idea, Andy Wingo, 2006/01/24
- Re: Another load path idea, Kevin Ryde, 2006/01/25
- Re: Another load path idea,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Another load path idea, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/26
- Re: Another load path idea, Kevin Ryde, 2006/01/26
- Re: Another load path idea, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/27
- Re: Another load path idea, Kevin Ryde, 2006/01/28
- Re: Another load path idea, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/30
- Re: Another load path idea, Greg Troxel, 2006/01/29
- Re: Another load path idea, Kevin Ryde, 2006/01/31
- Re: Another load path idea, Greg Troxel, 2006/01/31