guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guile 1.8.0 has been released.


From: Paul Emsley
Subject: Re: Guile 1.8.0 has been released.
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:27:08 +0000

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 00:03 +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the release of Guile 1.8.0.  It can be
> found here:
> 
>     ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.8.0.tar.gz

Dear Marius, 

Well, I at least think congratulations are in order:
Yahoo, hooray, woop!  
I've been waiting for this for a while.  I use guile in my project and
writing the scheme functions is the most fun part.

Now if I may conflate my congratulations with a problem report...
(I looked at the web page that you sent and didn't see my problems
there)

Libtool (or at least libltdl) has become a dependency of guile.
I don't have /usr/lib/libltdl.so on my system (Fedora Core 4), so the
configure failed (stopped as it should have done).

I installed a my own libtool then and I wanted to say to guile:
$ ./configure --with-libtool=/my/libtool/dir
but there was no way to do that.  I recommend that there should be.
So I used CFLAGS.  OK, that worked but was inelegant. 

OK, so make, make install...

But when I come to run the executable:
$ ~/guile/bin/guile
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
     ...
   ?: 123  [list apply ...
   ?: 124*  [list lambda (syntmp-dummy-3 syntmp-name-4 syntmp-rules-5) ...
   ?: 125*   [syntmp-chi-151 #(syntax-object # #) (# # # # ...) ...
   ?: 126*    [syntmp-make-binding-wrap-132 (# # #) ("i" "i" "i") (())]
   ?: 127     (if (null? syntmp-ids-949) syntmp-w-951 ...)
   ?: 128     [cons () ...
   ?: 129*     [cons ...
   ?: 130*      (let* ((syntmp-labelvec-952 #)) (let* (#) (let # #)))
   ?: 131       (let* ((syntmp-n-953 #)) (let (# #) (begin # #)))
          ...
   ?: 132       (begin # #)
   ?: 133*      [syntmp-f-956 (# # #) 0]
   ?: 134       (if (not #) (call-with-values # #))
          ...
   ?: 135       [call-with-values #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f #>]
   ?: 136       (@call-with-values (producer consumer))
   ?: 137*      [#<procedure #f ()>]
   ?: 138*      [syntmp-id-sym-name&marks-116 #(syntax-object dummy #) (())]
   ?: 139       (if (syntmp-syntax-object?-101 syntmp-x-980) (values # #) ...)
   ?: 140*      [syntmp-syntax-object?-101 #(syntax-object dummy (# # # shift 
...))]
   ?: 141       (and (vector? syntmp-x-1008) (= (vector-length syntmp-x-1008) 
3) ...)
   ?: 142*      (vector? syntmp-x-1008)

<unnamed port>: In expression (vector? syntmp-x-1008):
<unnamed port>: Stack overflow


What did I do wrong?
Your advice would be appreciated.

Paul.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]