Re: values->list elements

[Jonathan Wilson]

Ah... great minds DO think alike!
Regards,
Jon

Neil Jerram wrote:
> Jon Wilson <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > The intermediate step (after the macro expansion I guess) would look like
> >
> > (+ 1 2)
> > ==>
> > 3
> >
> > It seems like this would make multiple values much much more useful.
>
> I've often thought that too.  IMO multiple values per R5RS are a
> pretty half-baked concept.
>
> Regards,
>      Neil