[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly.
From: |
Hugh Sasse |
Subject: |
Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly. |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:01:18 +0000 (WET) |
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Hugh Sasse <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > I'm stumped. And sun's native patch implementation chokes on this.
>
> Should have been ok. Change the lines manually, or checkout the cvs
> "branch_release-1-8" if you're brave.
bash-2.05$ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:address@hidden:/sources/guile co -r
branch_release-1-8 guile
seems to have got the correct stuff, looking at guile-core/configure.in...
bash-2.05$ autoconf
configure.in:42: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
configure.in:49: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
configure.in:50: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONFIG_HEADER
configure.in:65: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL
configure.in:76: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_CC_STDC
configure.in:78: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_CC_C_O
configure.in:80: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN
configure.in:81: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
configure.in:82: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_CHECK_LIB
configure.in:88: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONDITIONAL
configure.in:90: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_LISPDIR
configure.in:198: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_LIBOBJ
configure.in:715: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT
bash-2.05$ pwd
/scratch/hgs/guile/guile/guile-core
bash-2.05$sh-2.05$ autconf --version; automake --version
bash: autconf: command not found
automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6
Written by Tom Tromey <address@hidden>.
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
bash-2.05$
bash-2.05$ : for completeness...
bash-2.05$ ggrep -C 4 AC_INIT ./configure.in
dnl "echo -n" since -n is not portable (see autoconf manual "Limitations of
dnl Builtins"), in particular on solaris it results in a literal "-n" in
dnl the output.
dnl
AC_INIT(patsubst(m4_esyscmd(. ./GUILE-VERSION && echo ${PACKAGE}),[
]),
patsubst(m4_esyscmd(. ./GUILE-VERSION && echo ${GUILE_VERSION}),[
]),
address@hidden)
bash-2.05$
So I think I've picked up the correct thing.
Hugh
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., (continued)
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/19
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/21
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/22
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/22
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/23
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/19
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/21
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/21
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/22
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/22
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly.,
Hugh Sasse <=
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/24
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/25
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/26
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/17
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/18
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/18
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Ludovic Courtès, 2007/01/18
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/15
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Hugh Sasse, 2007/01/16
- Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly., Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/17