[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf test for site scheme files
From: |
Mike Gran |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf test for site scheme files |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:03:01 -0700 (PDT) |
Ludovic-
Thanks. That was exactly what I was looking for.
I was going to castigate myself for not RTFM, but, I didn't commit that
particular sin this time. GUILE_SITE_DIR and other Guile Autoconf
support flags don't appear to be documented in the 1.8 reference
manual, as far as I can tell.
(I did find then in the 1.6.x reference manual, however.)
Thanks again,
Mike Gran
--- Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Note that the `GUILE_SITE_DIR' M4 macro gives you
> "`guile-config info pkgdatadir`/site". But as Greg said, you may
> want
> to avoid using it since it is independent of the `--prefix' option
> that
> was passed to your package's `configure'.
>
> Mike Gran <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > This brings up another question. Should %load-path should
> generally
> > include /usr/local/share/guile/site by default?
> >
> > Arguments in favor: it would keep symmetry with the emacs
> $(lispdir)
> > directory as described in the GNU coding standards. [1]
> > Philosophically, can something be "site"-specific and not be
> "local"?
>
> OTOH, why have two `site' directories by default?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludovic.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
>