Re: multo_module

[Frank J. R. Hanstick]

Hello,
	I noticed that there are lines designating -single_module and wonder  
if something changed to take the build process to the incorrect line  
in libtool.  I seem to remember several Darwin tests in the earlier  
build process that appear to be absent in the last two downloads.   
Were there changes to libtool or the configuration module?
Frank

On Oct 22, 2007, at 3:04 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:

> Hi,
>
> "Frank J. R. Hanstick" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-
> > prototypes -Werror   -o libguile.la -rpath /usr/local/lib -lintl - 
> > Wl,-
> > framework -Wl,CoreFoundation -version-info 17:1:0 -no-undefined
>
> [...]
>
> > ld: common symbols not allowed with MH_DYLIB output format with the -
> > multi_module option
> > /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a(mp_bpl.o) definition of common ___gmp_junk
> > (size 4)
> > /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
>
> [...]
>
> >         I had earlier asked about this in simpler form; but, got no
> > reply.   The line generating this error is 214 of libtool.  The
> > question is,  am I suppose to be getting here (there are lines with
> > -single_module  designated).  If the answer is yes, then how does the
> > line need to be  changed so that I do not get this error and if no,
> > what needs to be  changed to not get here?
>
> Sorry, I'm not familiar at all with Darwin's linker.  I suppose you'll
> have to further dig its documentation.
>
> Nevertheless, I think there were report of successful builds on  
> MacOS X
> in the past...
>
> Thanks,
> Ludovic.