[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: manipulating continuations
|
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
|
Subject: |
Re: manipulating continuations |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:56:56 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
() Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:16:20 +0100
R5RS and R6RS's continuations are not generally useful for making
abstractions that compose well together. I would not recommend them to
anyone.
Are you saying Guile 2.0 breaks code that uses these traditional
continuations (successfully, in previous Guile versions)? I think
the OP example should be in NEWS, if so, to avoid a surprise.