[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is guile still so slow?
From: |
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz |
Subject: |
Re: Why is guile still so slow? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:56:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Oct 12 2011, address@hidden wrote:
[...]
> Joking aside, maybe guile is too slow for writing whole apps in it,
> but it's primary goal is to be an extension language, a companion for
> another C/C++ program, or at best an orchestrator of business oriented
> code.
I really hope that that's not Guile's primary goal these days (and my
understanding is that it is not): i wouldn't be much interested if those
were its goals ("orchestrator of business oriented code" sounds
particularly dreadful :-)).
Goals aside, Guile 2.x looks to me as a perfectly fine platform to
implement a wide range of applications, and, IMHO, it should be promoted
and developed as such.
But IANAGD :-D
Cheers,
jao
--
Substitute damn every time you're inclined to write very; your editor will
delete it and the writing will be just as it should be.
-Mark Twain, author and humorist (1835-1910)
- Why is guile still so slow?, John Lewis, 2011/10/12
- Re: Why is guile still so slow?, rixed, 2011/10/12
- Re: Why is guile still so slow?,
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz <=
- Re: Why is guile still so slow?, Andy Wingo, 2011/10/13
- A bit further toward the flamewar, rixed, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Andy Wingo, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Linas Vepstas, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Mike Gran, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Linas Vepstas, 2011/10/13