guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: execlp


From: Nala Ginrut
Subject: Re: execlp
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:33 +0800

Well, I noticed your second question. ;-)
The common method to determine a executable file is stat:perms, you may check it out in the manual for details.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> wrote:
I think there's a bug.
(execlp "ls" "") will access.
Since the second parameter is optional, scm_execlp doesn't handle exec_argv unbounded situation.


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Paul Emsley <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to see if there is a way to determine if a program is in the path (i.e. a bit like "which"), returning a #t or #f answer.  I was looking execl and execlp.

The documentation for execl says:

> Executes the file named by path as a new process image

what is path ?  I'm guessing that that should be "filename".

While playing around, I notice that

(execlp "ls")

produces a core dump.

My question is then, *is* there a way to determine if a string is executable? (And if so, how? :-)

Thanks,

Paul.







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]