Re: SRFI-64 implementation for Guile 2.0

[Sunjoong Lee]

Now, srfi-64.scm works on Guile 1.8 and 2.0.

There are two different thins;

  1) Guile 1.8 does not support nested block comments.

     So, it does not pass srfi-64-test.scm test suite.

     But, comments are comments - not problem.

  2) srfi-64.scm on Guile 2.0 can catch and report the source form

     like this;

       source-file: "srfi-64-test.scm"

       source-line: 129

       source-form: (test-equal "1.1.1. Very simple" (quote (("a") ("b") () () () (1 1 0 0 0))) (t))

     srfi-64.scm on Guile 1.8 does not support it yet

     because I'm a newbie of scheme and don't understand Guile yet.

     I hope someone fix these problems;

       a) On Guile 2.0, I used (datum->syntax form (syntax->datum form))

       b) On Guile 2.0, I used (assq-ref (syntax-source form) 'filename)

2012/4/14 Sunjoong Lee <address@hidden>

2012/4/14 Per Bothner <address@hidden>

This is nice.  It would be great if the Guile port would be merged
into the reference implementation, presumably using cond-expand.
That way bug-fixes or changes in one could be more easily be
merged into the other.

Now, srfi-64.scm works on Chicken 4.7.

Per Bothner adviced me it's better to merge it into the reference implementation.

I was not convinced to check right merge.

So, I ported it for Chicken 4.7 and Guile 1.8 - it works now.

Right merge? I'm not sure yet but hope so.

srfi-64.scm.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data