[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clis
From: |
Ralf Mattes |
Subject: |
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:20:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Isn't the main problem here that the OP assumes that all three languages
have "the same syntax"? This isn't true at all. They share some basic
syntax but any "real" CL/Elisp/Scheme code will use more than this basic
subset. And even within this limited syntactic subset, while one syntax
will work the same syntactic consgruct will have different _semantics_.
Cheers, Ralf Mattes
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, (continued)
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/29
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/30
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Alexei Matveev, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs,
Ralf Mattes <=