[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dumb Licensing Questions
|
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
|
Subject: |
Re: Dumb Licensing Questions |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:17:50 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.5.1 |
On 12/24/2016 09:03 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> That's probably because YANAL.
>
> (sorry, couldn't resist).
>
> It's clear that there are different standpoints. The linking thing (dynamic
> or static) hasn't, AFAIK, tested in court. It's quite possible that different
> courts reach different conclusions (in the same or different places in the
> world). It's even possible (gasp!) that the legal interpretations of things
> change over time.
>
> If I were you, I'd just comply with what the FSF proposes, and that is pretty
> clear [1]. Any reasons not to comply with that?
>
> Sorry if this sounds a bit grumpy.
>
> regards
> -- tomás
>
Sorry, I just wanted to call attention to other opinions. Following the
FSF is the safe and sane choice.
Regards,
Florian