|
From: | Amirouche |
Subject: | Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful |
Date: | Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:23:39 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
Le 01/03/2017 à 20:21, Amirouche a écrit :
Le 14/02/2017 à 22:35, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit :Panicz Maciej Godek <address@hidden> writes:That sounds somehow like stackoverflow. We might already be going there :)There's surely many ways to approach that issue. The point is that for some reason, Schemers from various tribes prefer to reinvent the wheel, rather than use an existing one. (Not that I am any different) However, I also think that these CPAN-alike solutions are far from optimal: ideally, programming could be made an experience similar the game "The Journey" by thatgamecompany (where you travel to your goal and sometimes encounter other players heading the same direction), and the repository itself could look more like Wikipedia (but first we'd need to start perceiveing programming as a compact way of representing knowledge)That's a very good idea!
There is trusting issue tho. Do you trust all what is written in wikipedia right? You can not simply execute code from the programming cloud like that. I try to review
at least once the code I use. But I trust most of it to be safe.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |