[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: type friction C <-> scheme
From: |
Catonano |
Subject: |
Re: type friction C <-> scheme |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jun 2017 23:33:09 +0200 |
Mike,
2017-06-09 22:52 GMT+02:00 Mike Gran <address@hidden>:
>
> It appears that when I did bindings for guile-aspell,
> I used the form (list '* int '*), so that that int was
> used as a syntax or variable.
>
> https://github.com/spk121/guile-aspell/blob/master/aspell.scm#L165
>
>
Your suggestion eliminated that error. Thanks
Admittedly I don't fully understand the reasoning, maybe because it's late
in the night
In case I will still not understand tomorrow morning, I will write again
here
> Good luck,
>
Thank you very much !
- type friction C <-> scheme, Catonano, 2017/06/09
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Mike Gran, 2017/06/09
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme,
Catonano <=
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Matt Wette, 2017/06/09
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Catonano, 2017/06/09
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Matt Wette, 2017/06/09
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Catonano, 2017/06/10
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Mark H Weaver, 2017/06/11
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Matt Wette, 2017/06/11
- Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Catonano, 2017/06/11
Re: type friction C <-> scheme, Matt Wette, 2017/06/11