Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure

[David Kastrup]

Chris Marusich <address@hidden> writes:

> I think I'm missing something here.  In (list (f)), the call to f
> certainly looks like it's happening at a position that one might
> intuitively call a "tail" position.

It is, but list does not take multiple values and thus discards
additional values returned by f.  If list were a procedure/continuation
accepting multiple values, this would likely work as you expected.

-- 
David Kastrup