[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile bugs
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Guile bugs |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:22:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Marko Rauhamaa <address@hidden> writes:
> What you're saying points out a secondary problem that applies to
> Guile C programming. If you have stored Guile smob references in, say,
> third-party library objects, you'll need to carefully protect and
> unprotect them.
It may be worth mentioning that this includes _all_ C++ STL container
classes (like std::vector). If you want to employ them in connection
with Guile2's automatic memory scanning, you need to use them with
custom allocators.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Guile bugs, (continued)
- Re: Guile bugs, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/20
- Re: Guile bugs, Mark H Weaver, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Chris Vine, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Mark H Weaver, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Guile bugs, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Marko Rauhamaa, 2017/07/21
- Re: Guile bugs, Matt Wette, 2017/07/21