[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFIs
From: |
Christopher Howard |
Subject: |
Re: SRFIs |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:10:52 -0800 |
Do the SRFIs typically require any C hacking? It seems in Guile there
is usually a C function for each built-in scheme function, but I'm not
sure how that applies to SRFIs.
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 16:49 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Christopher,
>
> Christopher Howard <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > Hi, I was just wondering if Guile developers are planning to
> > implement
> > all the SRFIs eventually, or if they are just picking and choosing
> > a
> > few here and there? Put another way, is it just a matter of someone
> > volunteering the time to do each SRFI, or are some not being done
> > on
> > purpose?
>
> I can’t think of any SRFI being purposefully ignored, so I think it’s
> mostly a matter of someone volunteering to do the work.
>
> Ludo’.
>
--
Christopher Howard
Computer Assistant
Alaska Satellite Internet
3239 La Ree Way
Fairbanks, Alaska 99709
1-888-396-5623
https://alaskasatelliteinternet.com
personal web site: https://qlfiles.net
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- SRFIs, Christopher Howard, 2017/09/17
- Re: SRFIs, Amirouche Boubekki, 2017/09/17
- Re: SRFIs, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/09/18
- Re: SRFIs,
Christopher Howard <=
- Re: SRFIs, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2017/09/19