[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python-style doctests in Guile (implemented, please comment)
|
From: |
Vítor De Araújo |
|
Subject: |
Re: Python-style doctests in Guile (implemented, please comment) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:40:40 -0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 |
On 10/10/2017 15:21, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Hi Vitor,
>
> I’m sorry for answering so late; your suggestion stuck to my mind as a
> clean and schemish solution for my usecase (thank you!) but it took me
> quite a while to realize it.
I'm glad you liked it. :)
[snip]
> Now there’s one first question: How should I call it? :-)
>
> Currently the modules is (examples doctests). Do you have a better idea
> than "doctests"?
Maybe "proptests", since they are stored in the function properties
rather than inside the docstring? Or maybe "vectests", since they are
written inside a vector? (Of these I think "proptest" sounds better,
because it sounds more like "doctest".) Or maybe just go along with
"doctests".
> Best wishes,
> Arne
>
--
Vítor De Araújo
https://elmord.org/