[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ANN] guile-gi v0.0.1 released

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: [ANN] guile-gi v0.0.1 released
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 21:47:05 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)

Mike Gran writes:


> Both guile-gnome and my hack have two parts
> - an introspection layer
> - a gobject-to-guile binding
> I had a chat with Wingo at the last FOSDEM, and he thinks the
> gobject-to-guile binding could be reused, and that I could just swap
> the gwrap GTK+2 introspection layer with a GObject introspection
> layer.  I began analyzing that path a few months before life
> intervened.

Okay, good.

>> I'm quite new to all this, I cannot see the great difference in gtk+2
>> and gtk+3 here, even...
>> >> Patches also on my `wip' branch:
> I incorporated these, and fixed the bug that caused your editor example
> to fail.  Thanks!

Oh great, and that's fast.  Thanks!  You maybe even did a bit too well,
the `bytes_new_null_size.scm' test now passes.  I added that to
XFAIL_TEST because it fails -- now make check fails because this test is

The attach patch removes that workaround again.  If you apply this or
something equivalent, I will update the Guix package to point to your
updated repo.


>From 810baa9427145d08b4c9ff46ee442e296eb1911b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 21:40:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test: Update for passing bytes_new_null_size.scm.

* test/ (XFAIL_TESTS): Remove bytes_new_null_size.
 test/ | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/ b/test/
index e647105..3cca48f 100644
--- a/test/
+++ b/test/
@@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ TESTS = \
  gapplication_2.scm \
- bytes_new_null_size.scm
   ${top_builddir}/libtool \
   --dlopen=${top_builddir}/src/ \

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond
Freelance IT | Avatar®

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]