Re: [ANN] guile-gi v0.0.1 released

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Mike Gran writes:

Hi!

> Both guile-gnome and my hack have two parts
> - an introspection layer
> - a gobject-to-guile binding
>
> I had a chat with Wingo at the last FOSDEM, and he thinks the
> gobject-to-guile binding could be reused, and that I could just swap
> the gwrap GTK+2 introspection layer with a GObject introspection
> layer.  I began analyzing that path a few months before life
> intervened.

Okay, good.

>> I'm quite new to all this, I cannot see the great difference in gtk+2
>> and gtk+3 here, even...
>> 
>> >> Patches also on my `wip' branch: https://gitlab.com/janneke/guile-gi.git
>
> I incorporated these, and fixed the bug that caused your editor example
> to fail.  Thanks!

Oh great, and that's fast.  Thanks!  You maybe even did a bit too well,
the `bytes_new_null_size.scm' test now passes.  I added that to
XFAIL_TEST because it fails -- now make check fails because this test is
fixed.

The attach patch removes that workaround again.  If you apply this or
something equivalent, I will update the Guix package to point to your
updated repo.

Greetings,
jannneke

>From 810baa9427145d08b4c9ff46ee442e296eb1911b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 21:40:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test: Update for passing bytes_new_null_size.scm.

* test/Makefile.am (XFAIL_TESTS): Remove bytes_new_null_size.
---
 test/Makefile.am | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/Makefile.am b/test/Makefile.am
index e647105..3cca48f 100644
--- a/test/Makefile.am
+++ b/test/Makefile.am
@@ -39,9 +39,6 @@ TESTS = \
  gapplication_2.scm \
  softerror_create.scm
 
-XFAIL_TESTS = \
- bytes_new_null_size.scm
-
 SCM_LOG_COMPILER = \
   ${top_builddir}/libtool \
   --dlopen=${top_builddir}/src/libguile-gi.la \
-- 
2.21.0

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com