[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification)
From: |
Mikael Djurfeldt |
Subject: |
Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification) |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:30:14 +0200 |
It would be nice to be able to run scheme code in the client:
https://github.com/google/schism
They mention "the Webassembly GC proposal". :)
Maybe some day, the Guile compiler could emit WASM? That would mean
supporting multiple VMs.
Mikael
Den tors 24 okt. 2019 18:16Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> skrev:
> I've ever tried to write a site for our local community without any JS
> code, all auxiliary features include simple animation are implemented with
> CSS.
> However, I have to say it's painful to write a more complex site. I don't
> know if there's any framework for that. I'm too lazy to write all things
> manually. But I recommend you try it if you never did. It's interesting.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> <address@hidden> 于 2019年10月24日周四 22:58写道:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:35:52AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> > > Le jeu. 24 oct. 2019 à 03:01, Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Last time I checked the security requirements for web application that
> > > do not rely on JavaScript was too complicated. I preferred to forget
> > > about it.
> > >
> > > See
> >
> https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
> >
> > Now this is interesting. I still dream of an "application"
> > which is viable (perhaps with some restrictions) without
> > any javascript (as Wikipedia and relatives do, BTW). So
> > I'm interested in such things as above...
> >
> > Cheers
> > -- tomás
> >
>
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p, (continued)
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p, Mike Gerwitz, 2019/10/26
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/10/26
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p, tomas, 2019/10/26
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), tomas, 2019/10/24
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), Nala Ginrut, 2019/10/24
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), tomas, 2019/10/24
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2019/10/24
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), tomas, 2019/10/26
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/10/26
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), tomas, 2019/10/26
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification),
Mikael Djurfeldt <=
- Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification), Nala Ginrut, 2019/10/25
- mailman web interface (was: Diversification), pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/10/28
- Re: Diversification [ branched from Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile], tomas, 2019/10/23
- Re: Diversification [ branched from Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile], Chris Vine, 2019/10/23
- Mailman web interface [was: Re: Diversification], pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/10/23
- Re: Diversification [ branched from Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile], pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/10/23
- Re: Diversification [ branched from Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile], tomas, 2019/10/26
- Re: Diversification [ branched from Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile], pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/10/26
- Re: Diversification [ branched from Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile], tomas, 2019/10/26
- Re: Diversification [ branched from Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile], Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2019/10/26
- Prev by Date:
Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification)
- Next by Date:
Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification)
- Previous by thread:
Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification)
- Next by thread:
Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification)
- Index(es):