Re: resolving anonymous procedures in statprof

[Christopher Howard]

What, none of the Great Ones know the answer to this? Surely I can't be
the first to have anonymous functions in statprof'd code.

-- 
Christopher Howard
p: +1 (907) 374-0257
w: https://librehacker.com
social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker
gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net)

On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 05:24 -0900, Christopher Howard wrote:
> Hi, Guile's statprof utility is very helpful, but a lot of my output
> lines point to anonymous procedures like "anon #x1db7d38". Is there a
> way to figure out which specific lambdas those are referring to? In
> principle it seems like I should be able to figure that out by
> running
> the dissembler (,x) on the code I am profiling with statprof, but the
> addresses given by the dissassembler do not match the ones given by
> statprof.
>