[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome l

From: Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
Subject: Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:56:51 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3

Dmitry Alexandrov <> writes:

> Quoth <> (emphasis mine):
> | A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest 
> extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason, CC0 also 
> provides a *lax, permissive* license as a fallback. Both public domain works 
> and the lax license provided by CC0 are compatible with the GNU GPL.
> |
> | If you want to release your non-software work to the public domain, we 
> recommend you use CC0.
> Besides being GPL-compatible, itʼs FDL-compatible as well, while CC BY-SA is 
> not.

That information is outdated. Since 2015 cc BY-SA is one-way compatible
to GPLv3:

Back then I invested a lot of time to make that happen, because I
required it to be able to use art from Battle for Wesnoth, Ryzom, and
Wikipedia in one roleplaying book.

Best wishes,
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]