Re: Can guile be implementation independent?

[silas poulson]

Uncertain if anymore but Guile provides list of r7rs incompatiblities
here
<https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R7RS-Incompatibilities.html>

Silas

> On 17 Dec 2021, at 03:01, Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
> 
> Looks interesting, are there any known limitations in relation to Guile?
> 
> On 12/17/21 03:53, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>> Hi Jacob!
>> You may take a look at akku.scm
>> You can write r7rs code and use Guile as one of the compiler alternatives.
>> 
>> Best regards.
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 09:43 Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>> 
>>    I am used to working with common lisp where i can write code that is
>>    "implementation independent" meaning that following a specific coding
>>    style makes it compatible across multiple interpretators/compilers
>>    (sbcl, LispWorks, etc..)
>> 
>>    Is there a way to do the same on GNU Guile? Like writing a code
>>    that can
>>    be interpreted by implementations that are following the IEEE
>>    1178-2008
>>    or R7RS standard?
>> 
>>    -- Jacob Hrbek
>> 
> --
> -- Jacob Hrbek
> <publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 1677db82.asc>