guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: setting breakpoints at the repl


From: zx spectrumgomas
Subject: Re: setting breakpoints at the repl
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 13:58:22 +0100

  Hello. I tried and I think it works if first you load foo.scm . I'm in
Manjaro:

$guile3.0
GNU Guile 3.0.7.72-dc7f1
> ,break-at-source "/home/spectrumgomas/foo.scm" 3
No procedures found at  ~a:~a. "/home/spectrumgomas/foo.scm" 3
> (load "foo.scm")
> ,break-at-source "foo.scm" 3
No procedures found at  ~a:~a. "foo.scm" 3
> ,break-at-source "/home/spectrumgomas/foo.scm" 3
Trap 0: Breakpoint at /home/spectrumgomas/foo.scm:3


On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:26 PM Jose A. Ortega Ruiz <jao@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on improving the debugger interface for geiser-guile (the
> main idea is to be able to send debugging meta-commands from the
> *Geiser Dbg* buffer... there's something already in there in the HEAD
> branches), but i am failing to understand how to set breakpoints at the
> source level using ,break-at-source.  Basically, every single time i try
> to set one with something like
>
>     ,break-at-source "/home/jao/foo.scm" 3
>
> the REPL tells me back:
>
>     While executing meta-command:
>     No procedures found at ~a:~a. "/home/jao/foo.scm" 3
>
> I'm providing line numbers that fall inside procedure definitions (as
> advised by the meta-command's doctring), but i'm still getting the same
> error, no matter what.  For instance, foo.scm above contains
>
>        (define (foo x)
>          (display x)
>          (display x)  ;; wanted a bp here
>          (display x)
>          (display x))
>
> This is Guile 3.0.7, packaged by debian.
>
> I must be missing something obvious, but it's too late to drink more
> coffee :) What is it?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> jao
> --
> Lisp has assisted a number of our most gifted fellow humans in
> thinking previously impossible thoughts. —Edsger Dijkstra
>
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]