guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: timestamp


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: timestamp
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 14:38:58 +0200

> From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:49:10 +0100
> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
> 
> 
> Hi adriano,
> 
> I’ve got no good answers as to “why” things are the way they are, but
> the manual explains the range of these values:
> 
> > It seesm to be
> >
> > (tm:mon %3)
> >
> > This returns
> >
> > 11
> >
> > I expected 12 but ok, I recognize this kind of weirdness
> 
>  -- Scheme Procedure: tm:mon tm
>  -- Scheme Procedure: set-tm:mon tm val
>      Month (0-11).
> 
> > I'm unhappy with 
> >
> > (tm:year $3)
> >
> > This returns
> >
> > 120
> >
> > it's 2020
> >
> > Why would 120 represent 2020 ?
> 
>  -- Scheme Procedure: tm:year tm
>  -- Scheme Procedure: set-tm:year tm val
>      Year (70-), the year minus 1900.
> 
> I don’t know why this would be useful, but that’s what it is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It is simply how the C function 'localtime' returns its data,
basically for historical reasons.  Guile hands it to the application
without any changes.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]