Re: for with break and continue

[Damien Mattei]

yes in fact a lot of function related to syntax (datum->syntax, etc) are
not in R6RS and R7RS-small,
i have to keep that in mind because i want to write a library that could be
portable between scheme implementation and that support curly-infix ,less
than a number of scheme that count with the fingers of an hand ,at the
end.... :-) but 'for was a disgression,i know 'while of guile, again not
standard...

Regards,
Damien

On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 2:40 PM Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:

>
>
> Le 04/09/2022 à 14:00, Damien Mattei a écrit :
> > yes very good
> > then break si not overwritten, using module, i do not know if modules
> > is finally standardised in R6RS, and in guile?
>
>
>
> Guile supports R6RS libraries, but it's not the same as its traditional
> use-modules/define-module forms.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R6RS-Libraries.html
>
> But you're going to have a much more pressing problem with
> standardization: syntax parameters are not standard. So you're a bit
> stuck there.
>
>
>
> > a few problem with module i hope to fix it later but it works with
> > your example, not sure let/ec is standart?
>
>
> let/ec is not standard, but exceptions are. See section 7 of the
> libraries document of R6RS:
>
> http://www.r6rs.org/final/r6rs-lib.pdf
>
> Best,
> Jean
>
>