[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does declaration order matter in guile?
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: Does declaration order matter in guile? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:07:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.0 |
On 13-02-2023 09:05, Sascha Ziemann wrote:
You also can not ask Scheme about macros, because macros are not
first-class-citizens.
>
>
> This might be interesting:
>
https://matt.might.net/articles/metacircular-evaluation-and-first-class-run-time-macros/
You actually can ask (Guile)Scheme about macros, and they are
first-class (just not procedures, and almost never actually used as
first-class things):
;; first-class: macros are just a type of values
(let ((the-case-macro (module-ref (current-module) 'case)))
(pk the-case-macro) ; -> #<syntax-transformer case>
;; This type is disjoint from procedures:
(pk (procedure? the-case-macro)) ; -> #false
(pk (macro? the-case-macro)) ; -> #true
;; You can use macros to transform syntax to new syntax at runtime:
(pk (procedure? (macro-transformer the-case-macro))) ; -> #true
(pk ((macro-transformer the-case-macro)
#'(case number
((one) 1)
((two) 2)))) ; -> #<syntax: [lots of stuff]>
;; You can make macros at runtime (though usually you would just
;; pass syntax-transforming procedures instead of the macro wrapper
;; type):
(pk (make-syntax-transformer 'pick-a-name 'macro (lambda (s) #'0)))
(values))
While unconventional, in principle there is nothing stopping you
(besides cross-Scheme compatibility) from using a combination of
'let-syntax-syntax', 'syntax-case' and 'syntax-local-binding' to make
let macros accept macros as arguments. Example:
(use-modules (system syntax))
(define-syntax call-macro-for-each
(lambda (s)
(syntax-case s ()
((_ macro-identifier arg ...)
(call-with-values
(lambda ()
;; Note: syntax-local-binding implicitly calls macro-transformer
(syntax-local-binding #'macro-identifier))
(lambda (type value)
(unless (eq? type 'macro)
(error "first argument to call-macro-for-each must be an
identifier of a macro"))
(let loop ((arguments #'(arg ...)))
(syntax-case arguments ()
((last) (value #'last))
((stuff . more-stuff)
#`(begin #,(value #'stuff)
#,(loop #'more-stuff)))))))))))
(let-syntax ((pk+quote
(lambda (s)
#`(pk '#,s '-> #,s))))
(call-macro-for-each pk+quote (+ 1 1) (+ 1 2) (+ 1 3)))
;; Output:
;;; ((+ 1 1) -> 2)
;;; ((+ 1 2) -> 3)
;;; ((+ 1 3) -> 4)
$1 = 4
The only snag here is that each macro you want to pass to a
'higher-order macro', you need to give an identifier. As you can always
do that with 'let-syntax', that doesn't make it non-first class IMO.
Greetings,
Maxime.
OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature