[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: using a module : rename a single definition
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: using a module : rename a single definition |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Mar 2024 13:55:49 +0100 |
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:46:41AM +0100, Damien Mattei wrote:
> hello,
>
> is it possible to import a module having just one variable renamed (not
> all) , as in Racket:
>
> (require (rename-in srfi/42
> (: s42:))) ; Eager Comprehensions
>
> it seems in Guile either all is imported and prefixed or only a selection
> of bindings can be imported:
I was under the impression that #:renamer should give us enough rope
to shoot anyone in the foot ;-)
A quick and unscientific test -- this one should rename xcons to snoc
and leave all the rest of srfi-1 alone:
tomas@trotzki:~$ guile
GNU Guile 3.0.9.120-79e836-dirty
Copyright (C) 1995-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules ( (srfi srfi-1)
#:renamer (lambda (sym)
(if (eq? sym 'xcons)
'snoc
sym))))
scheme@(guile-user)> (snoc 'a 'b)
$1 = (b . a)
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature