40/45: reppar: Mention ACM TOMS, as suggested by Eric.

[Ludovic Courtès]

civodul pushed a commit to branch master
in repository maintenance.

commit 72b92d2c0036a63256571d202b0c222260055902
Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
Date:   Tue Jun 2 12:02:19 2015 +0200

    reppar: Mention ACM TOMS, as suggested by Eric.
---
 doc/reppar-2015/reproducible-hpc.skb |    6 +++++-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/reppar-2015/reproducible-hpc.skb 
b/doc/reppar-2015/reproducible-hpc.skb
index 595382d..8cb74af 100644
--- a/doc/reppar-2015/reproducible-hpc.skb
+++ b/doc/reppar-2015/reproducible-hpc.skb
@@ -196,7 +196,11 @@ software environment reproducibility into account.  For 
example, the
 approach for verifiable computational results described in ,(ref :bib
 'gavish2011:universal) focuses on workflows and conventions but does not
 mention the difficulty of reproducing full software environments.
-Likewise, the authors of ,(ref :bib 'stanisic2014:effective) propose a
+Likewise, the new Replicated Computational Results (RCR) initiative of
+the ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software acknowledges the
+importance of reproducible results, but does not adequately address the
+issue of software environments, which is a prerequisite.
+The authors of ,(ref :bib 'stanisic2014:effective) propose a
 methodology for reproducible research experiments in HPC.  To address
 the software-environment reproducibility problem they propose two
 unsatisfying approaches: one is to write down the