02/03: website: reproducibility-with-guix: Fix image links and table.

[Ludovic Courtès]

civodul pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix-artwork.

commit fc764d62d1904a296964679b67ba450b058f9f78
Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
AuthorDate: Tue Jan 14 16:21:09 2020 +0100

    website: reproducibility-with-guix: Fix image links and table.
    
    * website/posts/reproducibility-with-guix.md: Fix image links; turn
    table into a verbatim ASCII table.
---
 website/posts/reproducibility-with-guix.md | 37 +++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/website/posts/reproducibility-with-guix.md 
b/website/posts/reproducibility-with-guix.md
index 8c7ca54..5e8975c 100644
--- a/website/posts/reproducibility-with-guix.md
+++ b/website/posts/reproducibility-with-guix.md
@@ -394,31 +394,20 @@ unit.
 The following figure illustrates how the various pieces of information
 from a package are used in the build process (done explicitly by
 `guix build`, or implicitly when installing or otherwise using a
-package): ![](guix-package.png)
+package): ![Diagram of a Guix 
package.](https://guix.gnu.org/static/blog/img/guix-package.png)
 
 It may help to translate the Guix jargon to the vocabulary of C
 programming:
 
-<table>
-  <tr>
-    <th>Guix package</th>   <th>C program</th>
-  </tr>
-  <tr>
-    <td>source code</td>    <td>source code</td>
-  </tr>
-  <tr>
-    <td>inputs</td>         <td>libraries</td>
-  </tr>
-  <tr>
-    <td>arguments</td>      <td>compiler options</td>
-  </tr>
-  <tr>
-    <td>build system</td>   <td>compiler</td>
-  </tr>
-  <tr>
-    <td>output</td>         <td>executable</td>
-  </tr>
-</table>
+```
+| Guix package | C program        |
+|--------------+------------------|
+| source code  | source code      |
+| inputs       | libraries        |
+| arguments    | compiler options |
+| build system | compiler         |
+| output       | executable       |
+```
 
 Building a package can be considered a generalization of compiling a
 program. We could in fact create a \"GCC build system\" for Guix that
@@ -569,9 +558,9 @@ fundamentally distinct from its inputs. You could define a
 special-purpose build system for one package, and put all the source
 code in there. At the level of the CPU and the computer\'s memory, a
 build process (as in fact *any* computation) looks like
-![](computation.png) It is human interpretation that decomposes this
-into ![](data-code.png) and in a next step into
-![](data-program-environment.png) We can go on and divide the
+![Image of a 
computation.](https://guix.gnu.org/static/blog/img/computation.png) It is human 
interpretation that decomposes this
+into ![Code and data.](https://guix.gnu.org/static/blog/img/data-code.png) and 
in a next step into
+![Data, program, and 
environment.](https://guix.gnu.org/static/blog/img/data-program-environment.png)
 We can go on and divide the
 environment into operating system, development tools, and application
 software, for example, but the further we go in decomposing the input to
 a computation, the more arbitrary it gets.