guix-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add r-loomr.


From: Roel Janssen
Subject: Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add r-loomr.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:13:52 +0200

Hi Ricardo,


On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 18:02 +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Roel,
> 
> > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
> > 
> > roelj pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository guix.
> > 
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this
> > push:
> >      new 1f56ec0  gnu: Add r-loomr.
> > 1f56ec0 is described below
> > 
> > commit 1f56ec08af704bdc7aa3e143bf5ce351c5306dea
> > Author: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>
> > AuthorDate: Wed Sep 9 16:56:02 2020 +0200
> > 
> >     gnu: Add r-loomr.
> >     
> >     * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (r-loomr): New variable.
> 
> This is not free software.  See
> 
>    https://github.com/mojaveazure/loomR/pull/24


Oh shoot. I'm sorry I didn't see this discussion!


> Aside from this, I would like to say two things:
> 
> >  gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Let’s please not add R packages to (gnu packages bioinformatics) when
> it
> can be avoided.  (In this case there’s no CRAN package, so it’s
> fine.)

Where would I add a non-CRAN and non-Bioconductor package to?  Perhaps
this situation won't occur again, and should raise a flag, because I
think I've never had this case before.

> > +(define-public r-loomr
> > +  (package
> > +   (name "r-loomr")
> > +   (version "0.2.0-beta")
> > +   (source (origin
> > +            (method url-fetch)
> > +            (uri (string-append
> > +                  "https://github.com/mojaveazure/loomR/archive/";
> > +                  version ".tar.gz"))
> 
> This is not okay as these generated tarballs are not stable.  I
> haven’t
> seen these patches on guix-patches before — maybe I missed them.  But
> we
> have been avoiding these kind of URLs since a long time and had I
> seen
> the patches on guix-patches I and other would probably have pointed
> this
> out.
> 
> Can you please revert this ASAP?

I see you've reverted it already. Thanks for that!

I will default to submitting patches to guix-patches again.  I thought
it was trivial enough to just push.  My mistake.

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]