[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:25:01 +0200 |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> However, I am still confused that the GNU Emacs package with default
> options (--with-modules, --with-cairo, --disable-build-details)
> depends on LLVM via GTK+ and Mesa; and not on only GNU tools. Is it
> possible to build Emacs with Gtk compiled without LLVM?
Not as far as I know, but it's worth investigating.
I believe it's possible to build GTK against a reduced Mesa and a
reduced LLVM. See the discussions I started a few months ago on Mesa
and LLVM: we could save between 100 MiB and 300 MiB if I recall
correctly.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), (continued)
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Bengt Richter, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?),
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29