Re: A better way to access records.

[Brendan Tildesley]

On 30/10/20 8:49 pm, Leo Prikler wrote:
> Well, the "functional" way of accessing them all in one go would be to
>    (map (cute <> foo) (list package-name package-version package-...))
> But I assume you want syntax like
>
> (let-field record field exp*)
> (let-fields record (field1 field2...) exp*)
No I didn't want to specify the fields at all, just have all of them 
automatically defined.
> analogous to (srfi srfi-9 gnu) set-field and set-fields, am I right?
>
> Regards, Leo